Plotter Vs. Panster

By DeniseA.Agnew on April 4, 2009

A Writer’s Journey: Life Of A Panster

Rules? How many of you believe there are rules you must follow when writing a novel? How many of you are new writers? How long have you been writing?

*New writers often think there is a wrong way and a right way to write books. They eagerly join writing groups and devour how-to books with the idea that a gold answer on “how to write a book” will be dropped in their lap. There’s nothing wrong with this. Wanting to learn something new guarantees you’ll be curious enough to ask plenty of questions.

*In the process of learning, writers hear two words tossed around frequently. Panster and plotter. There are plenty of pros and cons for both types of approaches to writing a novel. Contrary to what a writer may hear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with writing either way.

*What becomes a problem is when an author tries to jam a square peg into a round hole and allows someone to tell them they should be a panster or a plotter. This doesn’t mean new writers shouldn’t learn craft. It means they have to take care that they are not writing according to so many strict rules there is no creativity left in the writing process.

Plotter vs. Panster

How many of you have heard of panster and plotter before you came here today?

What is your definition of each of these words?

*A plotter needs structure when they write. They often need charts, diagrams and outlines to feel comfortable. Many times they need to understanding what the beginning, middle, and end of the book before they start writing. Not knowing things ahead of time can create significant anxiety for the writer who is a plotter.

How many of you believe you might be a plotter? Do you do any of these things during your process and what are they?

*A panster needs varying degrees of freedom.

*A panster may have a title or an overarching idea for a book based on a time period, a concept, or an individual character. They may know one or two of these ideas up front. Or they may start with a single scene that intrigues them. They will rarely know the end of their book. (I only did this one time with one book…where I knew the ending.) Panster’s may have basic ideas about who their characters are.

*Most of the time outlining their books beforehand damages their ability to write. Writing a synopsis of their book beforehand can destroy the muse and create writer’s block.

How many of you think you are a panster? Why?

*Many authors discover they work best combining these two ways of doing things. It’s even possible an author may be a plotter for one book and a panster for another if it feels right.

The Controversy

*There is nothing wrong with either way of writing if it gets the job done. I have run into plotters who think panster writers waste time. They honestly can’t understand how not outlining or plotting up front can prove productive. Whole books have been written on if you “only do it this way, your book will be easier to write.” Well, it might. And it might not. No one ever said writing a book was easy. If it was, everyone would be doing it.

*In Anne Lamott’s BIRD BY BIRD, Anne describes the problem many pansters encounter if they try and force themselves into being a plotter when it isn’t natural for them, “Characters should not, conversely, serve as pawns for some plot you’ve dreamed up…I say don’t worry about plot. Worry about the characters. Let what they say or do reveal who they are and be involved in their lives, and keep asking yourself, ‘Now what happens?’…Your characters had something in mind all along that was brighter and much more meaningful than what you wanted to impose on them.” This is generally how I write a book.

Writer’s Journey

My journey as a writer has shown me that what is often true for one writer will not always work for another. Writing a book is wonderful, elating, fascinating, intriguing, frustrating, sometimes tedious process. With all those adjectives is a state of mind that most of us long for but find less than we would want: flow.

Writing In Flow

*Personal Definition of Flow: A sublime state of being unaware of your surroundings, steeped in ecstasy, contentment, a sense of well-being and rightness. A natural high when the entire universe seems to surge through your fingertips and onto the page. This state doesn’t materialize for most authors on an everyday basis, although it can be coaxed to emerge. What does all this have to do with the difference between a panster and a plotter?

*Recognize what type of author you are and honor that. If you are a new author, chances are you’ve started out as a panster. This doesn’t mean that you will stay that way. It may mean you decide later on that plotting, outlining, and diagramming everything from the get go is what you need to write the best book possible. If, however, you try to do all these things and find it gives you “creative constipation” where you can’t write a thing, chances are you are not a plotter. I decided some time ago that while I am mostly a panster, I am a bit of a plotter as well.

*For example, when I write a historical I start off by interviewing the hero and heroine. I ask them questions, write down their answers. This helps me to get inside their heads. If there is a bad guy, I question him as well. I also write down what my hero and heroine look like, their mode of dress, what they like too eat, etc. (I also do this with contemporary novels). I will often read a few books dealing with that time period or around the historical event in my book. This gives me ideas about some plot points I may want to put in my book, and I write these ideas down on notebook paper as they come to me. I also do some research before I start writing. However, I do not use researching relentlessly as an excuse not to start writing the book. I soak my head long enough to absorb the information into my bones. In that sense, I guess you could call me a plotter.

*When I write a contemporary novel I still sometimes soak my head in information before I start the book. A good example of that is my firefighter novel, COMBUSTION. I want to be accurate, so I made sure I had all firefighter resources I needed to keep my facts straight. With my SWAT series, HEART OF JUSTICE, I made sure I did the same by taping into police sources. This shouldn’t be mistaken as outlining a novel in my case.

*In conclusion, stay true to your writing dreams and don’t let anyone tell you that you can’t make this journey as a plotter, pantster, or a combination of both.

Comments

5 responses to “Plotter Vs. Panster”

  1. Great article, Denise!

    I’m a pantster who does some plotting. LOL

    I always know my characters, who they are, what their problems and motivation are. I may have a few ideas about scenes I want to include. I start writing when I have the opening scene set in my head. Then, I follow where my characters take me.

    I figure every way is the right way as long as the book gets written.

  2. Hi NJ! I see that my post went up earlier than I meant it to go up. Oops. :) You sound like you’re more of a plotter than I am perhaps. :)

    Denise

  3. I’m definitely a pantster, who’s made many attempts to ‘reform’. I have to think it’s got to be easier plotting things out. Too bad it leads to that creative constipation!

  4. Doesn’t genre come into play here? I write mysteries and suspense novels, both of which have to be plotted out quite carefully. To not do so would result in much wasted effort.

  5. This is brilliant. I am currently writing my first book, and I’d never heard of plotter or panster. However, a kind friend has offered to review the first three chapters (I’m currently on Chapter four) but has requested a synopsis. I couldn’t write a synopsis, I mean – how could I? Most of my characters start off in a scene and do their own thing. I get carried away at my table, giggling as I write. For me they just come alive, with no real clear outlined plot. Today I thought I was was crazy not having everything pre-planned in such detail like my friend (a published author)…now I realise other people are like this too. I only hope when I’ve finished it I am lucky enough to see other people enjoy it like I am…many thanks for such an informative read from such an ill-informed trying-to-be author xx

Write a Comment