There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed. ~
Earnest Hemingway
I have to confess, Yahoo Answers is something of a guilty pleasure of mine. I often take breaks from writing to take a look at the lists and see what people are asking. Sometimes I even answer a few questions myself. Some of the questions are silly, especially in the Religion and Spirituality section. Most of these questions begin with ‘spiritually speaking,’ or more recently, ‘spiritually snacking.’ I wasn’t sure just what that entailed, so I left that question alone.
Some are troll questions meant either to provoke or taunt. Sometimes these are funny too, but most of the time they’re not. I ignore them. And then there are questions that are quite mundane, regarding instructions on how to get a spot out of a jacket, or how to select the best groomer for your Lhasa apso, or how to go about getting a cheating boyfriend neutered. (Okay so I made that one up.)
And then there are the rare gems, those that glisten brilliantly on the beach of foolishness and minutiae. These are the questions that are often thought provoking, and occasionally profound. Some of these rare gems I contemplate while taking my evening walk, during meditation practice or while doing yoga.
Yesterday I came across one of these rare gems. It was actually a troll question, written by an atheist to goad theists into an angry tirade, but despite the intent of the question, the idea behind it was profound.
I’d like to share that with you today if I may, and play with it a bit by taking it out of its theological context and applying it to us writers, our careers and how, at times, as Papa Hemingway once said, we sit at our typewriters and bleed.
The essence of the question is this, which do you value most, reason or faith?
This is obviously an either/or question, but that doesn’t matter in our context. Because without both, a person’s writing career isn’t just going to bleed. It’s going to dry up and blow away. And I’ll show you why.
I’d like to talk about reason first. And in this context I’m not referring to good old fashioned common sense, that tells an aspiring writer that she must sit down and learn the art and craft (because yes, it is indeed both) but instead, I’m talking about what I call Darwinian or survival-of-the-fittest- kind of reasoning. The kind of rationale your best friend expounds on your commencement from grad school. The kind that says you’re not going to waste a good master’s degree by playing on the computer all day.
Reason dictates that unless you’re Stephen King, Danielle Steele or Nora Roberts, the writing life is difficult at best, virtually impossible at worst. And I suspect that even the big bucks mega list writers has opened a proverbial vein or two, especially during the early stages in their careers. Yet these kind folks proved that they could survive as a species. The rest of us, according to rationalists, may or may not evolve depending upon the arrival of our first royalty check.
Darwinian reason dictates that writing—much less publishing, marketing, and obtaining precious shelf space in book and mortar stores—is difficult if not impossible for aspiring writers. Which in some ways is true, but it’s not the absolute truth. Darwinian reason is pure cold water intellectualism that never ever sees a positive outcome. Rationalization has no emotion. It has no hope, no depth and certainly no warmth. It wants us to never place a precious drop of blood on our keyboards. Because writing, as Hemingway so sanguinely put, is a bloody business. We open our veins the first time we send out a fledgling manuscript, only to have it rejected time and time again, then finally the sale. The triumph. But it still comes with a price. The Darwinians want us to stop at this point. You see, they cannot stand the sight of blood.
And should we dare to try, and succeed, Darwinian reason will tell us that our success was nothing more than a statistical fluke. It will sneer; twirl its mustache and say, “sure fine, you did it once. But where’s the money? Where’s those megabucks? And most of all, can you pull it off again?”
Those of us who are able to evolve do, according to the Darwinian rationalist, but those are rare creatures indeed. The rest of us perish, or at least go back to our day jobs. Those who only wish they could and resent the fact that we do live something of a parasitic existence by belittling those of us who can. You know the kind. The ones who are just too plain lazy to grow arms and legs and crawl out of the swamp. The person at the party (and there’s always at least one) who tells us that they’d love to write a novel but don’t have the time. Why? Because they know that at some point they’ll have to bleed. And they can’t stand that thought.
Rationalization doesn’t fall strictly to outside forces. It’s inside of us too. It happens each time we sit down to the computer or to the legal pad and pen and say to ourselves, this is too hard. I can’t do this. The kids are acting up. The car won’t start. The husband is bellowing for dinner. Or worse, we let our fears conquer us, and old tapes of criticism and discouragement roll on and on inside our heads. What everyone says is true. I shouldn’t waste my time.
And then there’s the faithful writer. Faith looks past obstacles, ignores naysayers, tells the Darwinian rationalists to get stuffed and peruse their careers with gusto, if nothing else. They’re not afraid to bleed. In fact, they dump pints of the stuff on their keyboards, happy as vampires in a Red Cross blood supply tent. The problem is, they’re not bleeding. They’re hemorrhaging.
The faithful writer jumps in instantly, without worrying about learning the basics of grammar or spelling. They might not have talent, or any real understanding of grammatical mechanics, much less how the publishing industry works, but they’re writers by god, and they’ll publish even if they have to do it themselves. And often do.
The faithful writer is the one who submits to publishing houses without bothering to read the submissions guidelines, much less follow them to the letter. The faithful writer sends submissions to publishers electronically when the publishing house specifically asks for authors to send hard copy only. The faithful writer assumes that the editor is going to see their work; no matter how badly it’s formatted, clutch it to her breast and says “my next best seller!’
For obvious reasons faith and reason simply cannot stand alone. Especially not in the context we’re playing with. Faith and reason are like a pair of strong legs, both straight, both firmly planted on the firm ground of good old fashioned common sense.
A writer who uses faithful reason knows that she must learn her craft. She knows the basics of good sentence structure; knows the rules of grammar and how to implement them. The reasonably faithful writer understands that she cannot publish what she has not written, so she goes to her keyboard and, yes, bleeds. She listens to constructive advice and casts aside those Darwinian thinkers who say it cannot or should not be done.
The reasonably faithful writer knows how to prepare a marketable manuscript. She submits to reputable publishing houses, using their guidelines and following the instructions to the smallest detail. The reasonably faithful writer doesn’t sit down and wait for a response. She gets to work right away on the next project, letting criticism and Darwinian thinking fall by the wayside. She knows there are obstacles to writing and publishing, but she is aware of them and knows how to deal with them. The reasonably faithful writer is confident. The reasonably faithful writer, most of all, constantly evaluates her skills and always, always is willing to learn more.
Every writer, from Shakespeare and Keats, to King and Harper Lee, all started out as one thing; ordinary people with a spark of inspiration, a bit of talent, and the longing to tell a good story. They, like ourselves, neither follow blindly, nor rationalize or walk away in despair.
We, like them, stand steadfast and true to our words, our beliefs, and our inner strength. And most of all, they were willing to bleed.
So we are.
So say we all.
END OF LINE

